Skip to content

Net Neutrality

Recently, we’ve seen a change in US FCC policy intended to reverse the Obama-era ruling on net neutrality.  The original ruling had prevented Internet backbone companies from restricting bandwidth by services.  The proposed change is called Internet Freedom.  This name reminds me of doublethink in George Orwells‘ book 1984.  Its freedom for corporations, but not for individuals.  In fact, it’s simply deregulation with another name.

The intent of this change is to permit Internet companies to adjust bandwidth according to service.  The risk is that they may favour the services that they own, or may make independant services pay extra for bandwidth on their Internet backbones.

As I said, this change amounts to deregulation.  Wasn’t it deregulation of the banks that caused the 2008 recession?  Regulation is a legitimate function of government.  It’s not just needless red tape:  it’s there for a good reason.  Regulation is a way for governments to protect consumers.

Of course, the need for regulation depends on the amount of competition within an industry.  Good competition benefits consumers by maintaining lower prices.  Good competition also produces a hostile environment for companies, with tiny profit margins and the constant possibility of bankrupcy.

That’s why companies strive to eliminage competition by a variety of means.  They buy up other companies.  They drive others out of business.  They seek protection or subsidies from governments.  This move towards monopoly benefits companies and company owners, even as it deprives consumers of the benefits of competition.

Who is left to protect the consumer?  Only government is left.  They can prevent business activity that restricts competition.  If there are only a few large companies left in an industry, government can impose regulations on all of them.  That’s the reason that net neutrality must be maintained, so that all services can thrive, and so that consumers can choose fairly among services that are available on the Internet.

 

Advertisements

Hot Water is Good

Last Sunday, when I was making supper, I noticed that the hot water from the tap was not hot, but just warm.  Something was wrong.  I went down the basement to look at my hot water heater.  Water was dripping out the bottom, and running across the floor to the floor drain.  Fortunately, the stream of water missed all the furniture in the basement.  I shut off the cold water feed to the water heater, and mopped up the floor.  The red button on the gas controller had already popped up, meaning that the pilot light had gone out.

The sink was full of dirty dishes.  I had intended to put them in the dishwasher after supper.  That was no longer possible, with no hot water.  I had intended to have a shower the next morning.  That was also no longer possible.  There was no way I was going to have a cold shower.  The very thought made me shiver.  I was going to call the local plumbing and heating company in the morning to get a new water heater, but I didn’t know what they would say.  I was filled with anxiety.  Needless to say, I didn’t sleep well that night.

What am I going to do?  I thought about living conditions in the north of England, that I had read about in The Road to Wigan Pier, by George Orwell.  The houses there had a single water tap, cold water only, over the kitchen sink.  People living there had to heat water on the stove for washing dishes or for filling the bathtub.  I could do that too, although I had an electric kettle instead.  How long would I have to live like that?

The next morning, I had breakfast with plastic utensils and the one plate I had left.  At 8:00 am, I called the plumbing and heating company.  I told them that I needed a new hot water heater.  The person I spoke to said that she was very sorry, but they couldn’t do it today.  I said “How about tomorrow?”, trying to be cooperative.  She asked me if I could hold the phone for a second.  She would be right back.  Five minutes later, she told me that they had shuffled things around, and that somebody would be there with a new water heater within the hour.  I was very grateful.

I’d been through this process before.  I had partially drained the tank.  I had a hot water tap left open all night to relieve the pressure.  The gas was off.  The furniture was out of the way.  There was a ring at my front door.  It was the first person from the plumbing and heating company.  The second showed up a few minutes later.  It took them less than an hour to install my new tank and haul the old one away.  They did an excellent job of installation.  I was very pleased.  When they left, the new tank was heating water.  I was happy to pay them.

I went out for lunch, but when I returned the hot water was hot.  This was wonderful.  I loaded all the dishes in the dishwasher, and started it running.  I had a shower.  Pretty soon, my life was back to normal.  I’d grown so used to hot water that I expected it to be there all of the time.  One little interruption was quite disruptive.  I was amazed by how dependant on hot water I had become.  I learned gratitude for the small comforts of life.

Death Tax

US president Trump called it a death tax.  He wants to reduce the estate tax for wealthy people.  He claims that the death tax kills the American dream.  Is this really true?

My brother also calls estate tax the death tax.  He sees it as the tax collector’s last kick at the can.  Why do we have an estate tax?

Reducing it seems reasonable.  Nobody likes to pay taxes.  We are allowed to avoid estate tax by any legal means.  Hiding your wealth is not a legal means.  Still, why do we have estate tax at all?

Fairness is one of the policies that people want from government.  Fairness means that your success in life depends only on your skill, your knowledge, and your initiative.  Nobody gets a head start in life.  That’s the american dream.  Anything else is not fair.  People want life to be fair to them.

Estate tax promotes fairness.  It prevents people from getting a head start in life simply because their ancestors accumulated wealth.  It also discourages formation of family dynasties.  People who believe in extreme fairness would like the estate tax rate set at 100%, meaning that the government takes everything when you die.  People who believe in extreme freedom, on the other hand, would like the tax rate set at zero, meaning that all of your wealth can be willed to your descentants.  Neither of these extremes are possible in practice.  Governments want to provide both fairness and freedom, which they can do in moderate amounts.  This principle means that estate taxes will be somewhere between 0% and 100%, so that we must give part of our wealth to the government when we die.  It’s not just a scheme to finance the role of government; it has a higher purpose than that.

 

Osteoporosis

Most, if not all, osteopororis drugs have nasty side effects.  Adding calcium  to your diet is also not effective, although it was once thought to be.  There’s only one choice left: exercise.

Osteoporosis means that the calcium content of your bones is too low.  This is usually shown by a bone scan.  It’s calcium that gives strength to your bones.  Low calcium means that your bones are too weak.  They break too easily.

Doctors used to advice you to increase the amount of calcium in your diet, usually in the form of dairy products.  They reasoned that your bones would take up more calcium if you had more in your diet.  This idea has proven to be wrong.  Only exercise will strengthen your bones by having them absorb more calcium.  Of course, you do need to maintain adequate calcium in your diet at the same time.

You see, bones have a built-in regulation mechanism.  They only incorporate calcium into their structure when it’s needed to strengthen your bones to meet the needs of your daily life.  Your bones will even release calcium when they don’t need it.  The bones of astronauts living in zero gravity become depleted of calcium.  The same thing happens if your lead a sedentary life style.  This loss of calcium is not normally a problem because the bones maintain a large safety factor, keeping adequate strength to prevent breakage.  Likewise, increased stress on the bones will cause them to incorporate more calcium.

First of all, f0llow your doctor’s advice.  Your doctor will schedule bone scans and prescribe treatment.  It’s usually diet and exercise.  Do the exercise.  Any exercise that puts stress on your bones will work.  Walking or running is good.  It is critical that you do the exercise in an upright position.  Curiously the same exercise lying down has no effect on the calcium content of bones.

 

We Came From an Ape

At lunch recently, a woman asked: do you believe we came from apes?  Of course, this is a well-known phrase, designed to provoke outrage.  Two of us responded.  We both said almost the same thing, that the answer was yes, but that it happened millions of years ago.

When I thought about this question later, I realized that it was not literally true.  In fact, the question reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution.

There are many misunderstandings about evolution.  Present-day gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans are not our ancestors.  They evolved just like we did.  More that five million years ago, apes and humans had a common ancestor.  At that time, the line of descent split into two lines.  Both apes and humans  evolved since that time, in different directions.  Our common ancestor was part way between an ancient ape and an ancient human.  It wasn’t an ape as we know them today.

There’s also no chain.  The great chain of being has been cited many times.  This is another misunderstanding of evolution.  Branches in a bush is a better metaphor than a chain or a ladder.  At times, many similar species lived side-by-side.  Some species became extinct.  Some species lived.  Some lines of descent split into two lines, just like branches in a bush.

There’s also no direction to evolution.  This is another misunderstanding.  Evolution follows the law of chance.  Creatures with large brains, like us, are not the pinacle of evolution.  Survival is all that’s required.  There are many strategies for survival.  Large brains is only one strategy.  Every living creature that we see today has found a strategy for survival.  Some, like us, have been successful.  Others have failed, sometimes a result of our success and our proliferation.  That’s life.

 

Dealing With Extremists

It’s those extremists again!  What can we do about them?  Well, you can vote for one thing.  We don’t have an election now.  It’s only every four or five years.  What can we do right now?  You can demonstrate against them.  You can even fight them.  You can urge the government to make them illegal.  What’s the best thing to do?  What’s the right thing to do?

Making membership in certain groups illegal is actually the wrong thing to do.  There are lots of examples why this is so.  The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was suppressed for years, by many different governments.  Members were put in jail.  Some leaders were executed.  These actions only made them more militant and more extreme.  The Communist Party in the US was made illegal, resulting in widespread accusations.  People were condemned, based only on these accusations.  One journalist was accused of attending a meeting with a known communist.  It was only later that he discovered that the meeting was the UN general assembly, and the known communist was Nikita Krushev.  Consider also the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany.  Laws were made that identified them by race, for increasingly harsh punishment.  Many were driven out of the country.  Many were exterminated.  The lesson is clear:  laws must apply to everybody in a society.

We already have criminal laws that apply to everyone.  They are sufficient.  We should not advocate laws that make certain groups illegal, even if most people don’t like what these groups are saying or doing.  Making these laws seems easy.  We only have to prove membership in an illegal group to obtain a conviction.  It’s easy, but it’s also dangerous.  It could be done for any group.  A goverment could use such a law to suppress the opposition, for example.  We need groups that are critical of the government.  We need opposition.  Such a law leads public opinion by presenting people with an enemy.  Just imagine what happens after that.  It’s divisive.  It’s polarizing.  Members become more militant.  We don’t need any of those things.

Fortunately, we have a representative democracy in this country.  The representatives speak for people in their areas, and make decisions on their behalf.  We also have free speech.  The opposition must be heard.  Even extremist groups must be heard.  It’s only when people express hatred of other groups that the law can be used against them.  People have civil rights in this country.  Any attempt to deprive them of those rights becomes a serious issue.  Again, these laws apply to everybody.  That’s how it should be.

 

My Menu Strategy

People have gotten the wrong idea about what I like in restaurants.  It’s usually lunch that I eat in restaurants, although I only do this a few times a week.  I eat all of my breakfasts at home, early in the morning.  Lunch is my main meal of the day.  Most of the time, I eat supper at home.  It’s only occasionally that I eat supper at a restaurant.  In any case, supper is a small meal for me.

I do have a strategy for choosing an item from a restaurant menu.  It’s mostly negative.  I avoid deep-fried food, especially fried potatoes and chicken wings.  I do eat fried potatoes, because I like them, but I limit them to once a week whenever I can.

I also avoid bacon, especially side bacon, and I avoid cheese.  Both of them contain too much fat for my liking.  Of course, restaurants put bacon and cheese on almost everything these days, to improve the flavour.  There’s not much left on the menu.

I also avoid overly sweet dishes.  These are usually desserts and are easy to avoid.  Sometimes they are french toast or waffles buried in powered sugar and whipped cream.  I avoid them too.

Finally, I look for a portion size that’s small enough that I can eat in one sitting.  I want to eat it all, but I don’t want to stuff myself or to take some home.  This part of my strategy is difficult because restaurants don’t specify the portion size on the menu.  Some do have sections for senior’s meals or lighter dishes.  Otherwise, I can only judge by the price, even though it’s not a good indication of portion size.

If at that point, there’s nothing left on the menu that I can eat, I compromise on one or two points, and scan the menu again.  What’s left?  It’s usually soups, salads, and a few sandwiches.  I don’t consider soup or salad to be a complete meal.  Sandwiches usually come with fried potatoes, something I avoid, but they usually offer a small soup or side salad as a substitute.  Sometimes they have a burger without bacon and cheese.  That’s often my only choice.  That’s where people get the impression that I like burgers, where it’s really the result of a processs of elimination.  I don’t generally chose what I like.  Instead, I avoid most of the dishes, choosing one that’s the least objectionable and that still appeals to me.